With the 2013 National Architecture Conference having wrapped up and Architectural life returning to normal programming, there is now time to go back and reflect on the event titled Transform: Altering the Future of Architecture. For those who missed my earlier post on the event, it was a full day workshop, run and organised by the team behind the Parlour: Women, Equity and Architecture website to discuss the practice of architecture.
Having decided to take annual leave to attend this event, I received a couple of confused looks and surprised responses when discussing my plans to participate. There are many reasons why I decided to go. Most importantly this agenda of achieving gender equality in the architecture profession is one that I strongly believe in. Architecture is for everyone, not just for males, and not just for what my history teacher referred to as the WASP’s (White, Anglo-Saxon, Protestants). Architecture must be inclusive to be relevant.
This event was also an opportunity to follow up on some of the issues I covered last year in my interview with Sonia Sarangi: Feminism and architecture in 2012. Issues such as how can we combat the ‘long hours mentality’ and achieve greater flexibility would be discussed in detail.
Perhaps the relevance of this workshop to architects of all persuasions is best summed up by, Shelley Penn
“Issues faced by women architects are an exaggeration of those faced by all architects”
– Shelley Penn
Long Hours and work life balance
Beginning in university, architecture has a culture of long hours and all-nighters. I remember asking a university colleague on the Friday morning of a submission when he last slept. His response was that he had a few hours of ‘shut eye’ on Tuesday night. This culture of doing massive hours flows into industry with the graduates eager to impress their new employers.
Speakers at Transform highlighted the foolishness of this culture and the negative effect it has on the industry. Those doing the long hours are almost always operating at a low productivity per hour. Those not doing the long hours feel guilty that they aren’t and therefore feel pressured to work the longer hours in order to feel valued.
Lee Hillam summed it up best
“You have to have a life to be a good architect.” Lee Hillam
To combat this unhealthy culture, it was put forward that directors and managers need to assess a team member’s output rather than the ‘hours in the chair’.
A big issue for many in the architecture profession is the lack of work flexibility. For many with or wanting children this is a very big deal, however from my experience it is valuable for everyone at some stage in life.
Two years ago my wife finished her PhD at Melbourne University. Being brilliant at what she does, she was offered a post doctoral fellowship with internationally renowned academics based in Newcastle NSW. This caused a dilemma for how to facilitate both of our budding careers simultaneously whilst ensuring our very strong relationship remained so.
For me, the opportunity for my wife and her career was far too important to be passed up. This realisation led to a conversation with my employer to negotiate the required flexibility. What was put on the table was a single year of work where I would be in the office every second week whilst working remotely over the internet the alternate week. The alternative to this arrangement, as I explained to my boss, was my resignation.
Fortunately he agreed and 2012 became one of careful scheduling, airports and a strange double life. With meetings scheduled in advance to coincide with the Melbourne weeks, the Newcastle time became freed up for highly productive drawing and design work. Between the remote desktop software, email and phone calls there were very few instances where my physical absence was an issue. In summary work flexibility is a win – win situation for both the employer and the employee.
As well as discussing a multitude of problems within the industry, there was also some possible answers in the form of draft guidelines for equitable practice presented to the workshop. This draft document currently has 10 chapters but may be expanded further after feedback
This is a very positive step which has potential to have a large effect on the industry if it is widely adopted. Architect Stuart Harrison suggested via twitter that the guidelines when finished could be made a requirement for practices who wish to sign up for A+ membership with the Australian Institute of Architects. To me this is an eminently sensible idea which could facilitate real change.
Expansion of recognition
Architects are good at self-recognition of excellent architecture through various awards programs. These awards are project based and are summarised down into glossy ‘hero shot’ photography. The question was posed at Transform, Why can’t we have Architecture awards for the best pro bono work or best family friendly practice? Taking it a step further how about awards for community leadership, mentoring or architectural advocacy? To me, this recognition of a scope of practice wider than that of design architect is fundamental to the advancement of the industry.
Naturally leadership will be key to addressing these issues and guiding the industry to an equitable future. Indeed it was commented that “what we need are leaders rather than Starchitects”. Whilst we obviously need a more diverse pool of architectural leaders it must be said that there are some remarkable people pushing this equity agenda. These people deserve the thanks and recognition of the industry
With her term as the National President of the Australian Institute of Architects having just completed Shelley Penn has done a fantastic job representing architects at all levels. What she brought to the position was refreshing and inspirational. One of the most amazing aspects of her role is that it was done whilst practicing as a sole practitioner.
Thanks and recognition must also go to the team behind the Equity and Diversity research, the Parlour Website and the Transform event.
Naomi Stead, University of Queensland senior research fellow and lead researcher on the Equity and Diversity in the Australian Architecture Profession: Women, work and leadership project
Karen Burns, University of Melbourne lecturer and Researcher on the Equity and Diversity project
Justine Clark, Architectural writer, Editor of Parlour and Researcher on the Equity and Diversity project
This work is already paying dividends for architects, graduates and students across Australia. It is truly world leading and is likely to have many ideas exported overseas for the benefit of the international community.
For further detailed accounts of the event and its fantastic speakers, here are some great articles worth reading.
Architecture is for everyone
Shelley Roberts Architect would like your assistance in supporting an event at The Savoy Ballroom at The Grand Hyatt Hotel on Saturday the 22nd June. The 2013 Homework Ball is organised by the Bethlehem Community to help its ongoing support of homeless women.
As well as supporting a very worthwhile cause you will have the opportunity of being entertained by the full cast of HAIR who will present a powerful pocket sized performance of the much loved hits from this iconic musical.
Other entertainment coups for the night include La Voce Della Luna choir, the Velvet Corporation and everyone’s favourite: DISCORAMA.
To book your tickets go to http://www.bethlehem.com.au/homework/